Liberals endlessly warn that tough business regulations are needed
to protect the environment and workplace. Conservatives counter forcefully that
regulations unnecessarily stifle businesses and cost jobs.
But the business regulations that may have the most
impact – under highly questionable policies – may be the licensing requirements
for dozens of occupations in each state.
Matthew Yglesias of Slate.com offers an interesting look
at licensing rules for everyone from barbers to bus drivers. What he found is a
system that is a mess – and an area desperate for reform that surely can be a
source of common ground for Democrats and Republicans.
Obviously, there’s a huge difference between dumping
mercury into a river and giving someone an especially bad haircut. Yet, the
regulations that most directly thwart entrepreneurs and new small businesses –
the real job creators – are rarely up for discussion.
Yglesias notes that studies have shown tax rates are
overrated as a predictor of where businesses want to locate. But licensing
requirements are “by far the best statistical predictor of
business-friendliness” for those small business owners subjected to such rules,
Yglesias wrote in a recent online piece for Slate.
A recent study by the Institute for Justice found that
licensing regulations receive little scrutiny and often reflect irrational
policy-making. For example, Nevada, Louisiana, Florida, and the District of
Columbia all require aspiring interior designers to undergo 2,190 hours of
training and apprenticeship and pass an exam before entering the marketplace.
Yet, in the other 47 states no training
requirement exists. Meanwhile, the public safety issue that the rules in the
three states are designed to address escapes me.
The study found that all states – except Alabama
-- require barbers to be licensed, but the requirements are random. New York
barbers need 884 days of education and apprenticeship, Yglesias wrote, but across
the river in New Jersey, it’s 280. I suspect an inexperienced barber who
consistently cranks out hatchet jobs on his customers’ heads will be pushed out
of business by word of mouth, with no government regulator intervening.
The Institute for Justice also detected an unmistakable
pattern: “The licensing of lower-income occupations is both widespread and
onerous – and, in many cases, irrational and arbitrary.” In other words, those who don’t have lobbyists
and can’t afford generous campaign contributions are the business owners hit
hardest by the lawmakers.
Based on costs, training requirements, age requirements
and other factors, the IJ report ranked each state based on how
business-friendly their licensing process is. Michigan ranked in the middle of
the pack at 26th.
Surprisingly, some of the states with the worst rankings
are those normally associated with low-tax, low-regulation, pro-business
policies – such as Nevada, Arkansas, Florida and South Carolina. In contrast,
some progressive states are ranked among those most welcoming to the private
sector – Colorado, Vermont, New York.
Another problem is the growing reliance upon licensing
requirements by states to, among other things, generate revenue through fees. According
to research, in the early 1950s less than 5 percent of the population worked in
occupations covered by state licensing rules. Today it’s well over 20 percent.
Here’s a portion of Yglesias’ piece:
“Some of this is surely justified. You need a license to
drive a car, so requiring a special license to drive a bus is reasonable. Even
there, though, you may wonder why it’s so much harder to become a licensed bus
driver in New Jersey than anywhere else.
“But a wide range of these rules could be done away with
entirely at basically no risk. Regulation is needed when it would make sense
for a firm to deliberately engage in malfeasance. Dumping harmful toxins into
the air is highly profitable unless it’s prohibited. Financiers can draw huge
bonuses by taking on too much risk, only to wreck the economy later. In other
occupations, though, shoddy work brings its own punishments. An interior
decorator who can’t get recommendations from satisfied customers probably won’t
remain an interior decorator for long.
“In these cases, licensing rules raise the prices the
rest of us pay, make it difficult for successful entrepreneurs to expand their
businesses, and are often a major barrier to employment for the most vulnerable
populations. New Jersey’s ban on high-school dropouts fixing locks sounds
silly, but given the generally bleak prospects facing workers with little
education, barring them from whole occupations is a big deal. States should
take a good, hard look at their existing codes and ask whether mass
unemployment isn’t generally a bigger threat to the public than rogue barbers.”
You can read more here.

No comments:
Post a Comment