Sen. Debbie Stabenow continues to paint her opponent,
former Republican congressman Pete Hoekstra, as a right-wing tea party-style
candidate.
Last week, the Democratic incumbent blasted Hoekstra for
his status as one of seven GOP Senate candidates who support a so-called
personhood law, which would give an embryo at conception the same rights as a
person. That would mean all abortions, including in cases of rape and incest,
would be outlawed.
While personhood is an issue closely connected to
hardcore conservatism, Hoekstra has gone one step further into right-wing
territory by backing a repeal of the 17th Amendment. This has to be
the craziest, most unpopular idea to come out of the tea party movement. The 17th
Amendment gives voters the basic right to elect the senators from their state.
A repeal would send our electoral system back to the pre-1913 days when each state
legislature, in a highly charged political atmosphere, appointed their state’s
senators.
Hoekstra first revealed his position last year when he
said that the 17th Amendment represents “an erosion of state’s
rights." Last week, in an interview on Michigan Public Radio, the Holland
Republican declined to walk back his support for repeal.
Stabenow has responded with a web ad chastising Hoekstra’s
position.
In a press release, the senator reminded voters about
some of Hoekstra’s other “out-of-the-mainstream” ideas. He has proposed
creating a government office staffed by federal agents to investigate
presidential candidates’ birth certificates. Hoekstra also remains a supporter
of former presidential candidate Herman Cain’s 9-9-9 tax plan, which lost
credibility among most Republicans several months ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment