In case you missed it, the written opinion striking down
the citizenship check-boxes on voter application forms which was delivered by
U.S. District Judge Paul Borman on Wednesday didn’t simply rule against
Secretary of State Ruth Johnson, in it he scolded Johnson for: making
convoluted arguments in court documents, ignoring Gov. Rick Snyder’s July veto
of legislation requiring a citizenship box, creating possible delays at the
polls, and allowing a two-tiered system of voter requirements that presents
constitutional issues.

When Johnson, a Holly Republican, tried to counter legal
arguments made by local clerks and voting rights advocates, she asserted that
the secretary of state has the power to alter the application forms that voters
fill out at the polls, but not the applications for absentee voters, the judge
appeared miffed.
“That argument won’t track!” he wrote.
Borman warned that a November election with the check-off
box could produce a “parade of horribles” because approximately 5 million Michigan
voters are expected to go to the polls, they will face a potentially confusing
bedsheet ballot, and they will be scrutinized by 30,000 poll challengers from
the Republican and Democratic parties.
![]() |
Judge Borman |
Though Johnson had changed her position, saying that the
checkoff box would be voluntary, the judge chastised the secretary of state for
creating a messy situation: It is likely that many challengers will
challenge voters who do not fill in the citizenship check box, even though they
do not need to fill it out to get a ballot – because the challengers don’t know
that voters are not required to fill it in!”
There’s that second exclamation point.
The judge had more to say in great
detail -- about Johnson’s mismanagement of the check-off box confusion on the August
primary Election Day and her subsequent failure to deal forthrightly with the
mutiny against the citizenship box by local clerks – but I think it’s safe to
say that the secretary of state never wants to appear in Borman’s court again.
No comments:
Post a Comment