The
Des Moines Register, Iowa’s largest and most respected newspaper, has raised
doubts about Hillary Clinton’s razor-thin margin of victory in Monday’s Democratic
caucuses and the editorial board is calling for an audit of all ballots cast.
In
an editorial carrying the headline, “Something stinks in the Democratic Party,”
the Register declares the caucus-style election a laughable “debacle” that
cannot stand unchallenged.
As
I mentioned on this blog a few days ago, the 2012 Iowa caucuses on the
Republican side were fraught with a host of embarrassing gaffes and outright
incompetence. Beyond Rick Santorum being declared the winner – not Mitt Romney,
as originally announced – many days later, vote-counting errors and entire vote
totals missing from some precincts were later revealed.
The
Register, to its great credit, dug up all these anomalies. But it appears that
Iowa party officials learned nothing from the disturbing outcome of four years
ago.
“What
happened Monday night at the Democratic caucuses was a debacle, period.
Democracy, particularly at the local party level, can be slow, messy and
obscure. But the refusal to undergo scrutiny or allow for an appeal reeks of
autocracy,” the Register’s editorial team wrote. “The Iowa Democratic Party
must act quickly to assure the accuracy of the caucus results, beyond a shadow
of a doubt.”
The
newspaper warned that too many opportunities for error were evident in the
flawed process.
“Too
many accounts have arisen of inconsistent counts, untrained and overwhelmed
volunteers, confused voters, cramped precinct locations, a lack of voter
registration forms and other problems. Too many of us, including members of the
Register editorial board who were observing caucuses, saw opportunities for
error amid Monday night’s chaos.”
The
editorial ended by calling on the state's Democratic Party to “work with all
the campaigns to audit results. Break silly party tradition and release the raw
vote totals. Provide a list of each precinct coin flip and its outcome, as well as other information sought by the Register. Be
transparent.”
No comments:
Post a Comment