The scandal ensnaring former general David Petraeus
reveals a lot of bad behavior but one player in this soap opera, FBI agent Frederick
W. Humphries II, deserves an apology from hundreds of media outlets across the
nation.
It turns out that the shirtless photo of Humphries was an
email joke, not an attempt to woo the affections of Jill Kelley, the Tampa
socialite who’s a key figure in this controversy.
![]() |
Photo/Seattle Times |
In fact, the photo (above) was sent two years
ago and is clearly nothing more than an attempt by Humphries to poke fun at
himself. It shows Humphries posing with two gun range targets – bald-headed
dummies that bare – I should say bear -- a striking resemblance to the federal
agent.
The Seattle Times broke the story after a copy of the
email was leaked to the paper. Kelley, a Humphries family friend, was one of
the recipients of the email that featured a picture-attachment of Humphries “posing
with a couple of dummies,” according to the Times.
A former Army intelligence officer, Humphries was known
to send joke emails in which the punch line is delivered when an attached photo
is opened.
Humphries, 47, apparently sent the photo to Kelley and
others in the fall of 2010, shortly after he had transferred to the FBI’s Tampa
office from Guantánamo Bay, where he had served as a liaison for the bureau to
the CIA at the detention facility, the Times reported.
Why the FBI never stepped in and straightened out this
messy mix of false information, especially after Humphries was identified and
became the butt of jokes on late-night TV shows, is incomprehensible.
True, Humphries was not well-liked by some FBI higher-ups
because he butted his way into the investigation of Kelley’s emails and went
rogue by seeking help for her from two congressmen.
But the reprimand he received for those actions should
not have prevented someone from stepping forward when the story, which went
viral online days ago, was so obviously wrong.
From Mount Clemens, Senior National Security Beefcake Reporter Chad Selweski!
ReplyDeleteWhy should anyone care what you think, Selweski?
Since when does Selweski care about accuracy in reporting? Especially when it is well known that Selweski uses political hacks for background. Is it a surprise when the story is biased in favor of the hack, who's name is nowhere to be found. How is that transparent Selweski when Bruley and others are calling the shots?
ReplyDeleteYou are not a reporter, but a tool of the propaganda ministers. Prove me wrong!