Monday, November 26, 2012

A lovely tribute to Lincoln – the movie and the man






Mark Salter, a speechwriter who served as Sen. John McCain’s chief of staff, has written a piece on Lincoln – the man and the movie – that may move you to tears.
In his column for realclearpolitics, Salter reminds us of the fragile state of democracy in the world at the time that Lincoln was seeking a complete victory in the U.S. Civil War and a final defeat for the slave trade.

“Human nature was long considered too corrupt and venal to be allowed self-determination,” Salter wrote. “Kingdoms and empires were the work of the high-born, the enlightened, God’s anointed.”
Abraham Lincoln, a man born into extreme poverty whose life was filled with far more tragedy than success, was certainly not one of the “high-born.” But what Lincoln demonstrated – as illuminated by Steven Spielberg’s wonderful directing – was the higher plain that an average man can reach, to the benefit of all of us.

Here’s Salter: “What did Lincoln prove? That a democracy could succeed -- that it need not descend into chaos despite the flaws of our nature? Yes, he did, but more than that, too. His life story proved the faith that lies behind that proposition. He proved that the lives of human beings are a struggle -- some successful, others not -- to cultivate a second nature, our character. We can become better, and freedom aids us in that struggle by letting us think and be responsible for ourselves.”

1 comment:

  1. I think Lincoln's lesson, similar to George Washington's, was that belief in the Democratic Republic form of government, as set forth in our Constitution, trumps all things. The ideal and loyalty is not to a clan, tribe, ethnic group, political party, or other demographic, it is to our Constitution and the family of institutions which spring forth from it, and the belief that the laws set forth apply equally to all. Thus, although not stated in the Constitution, this country held free elections while large segments were in open rebellion. And what if Lincoln had lost the election of 1864? Would we be divided, I advance no. Because McClellan or Fremont, although "peace candidates" would have followed the Constitution as well. We would be speculating, but we know what Lincoln did.

    ReplyDelete