
As disgruntled tea party
activists advocate the idea of not voting for Gov. Rick Snyder – or, God help them, supporting his Democratic opponent, Mark Schauer – one leader of the
anti-establishment crowd within the Michigan Republican Party has made it clear
that her agenda is to create gridlock in the state Legislature.
Isabelle Terry of Rockford,
a member of the Republican state committee, told the MIRS news service that
if former Democratic governor Jennifer Granholm had been in office over the
past four years, the tea party types would have been better off.
Republicans in the state
House and Senate would have stuck to the party's platform and fought
Medicaid expansion and the new Common Core education standards, she said.
As the November election
approaches, Terry sees a vote for Schauer, rather than the “liberal” Snyder, as
a vote for gridlock, according to MIRS.
“I think gridlock is the way to go,” she
said.
Those remarks must have stunned
the establishment Republicans who are already furious over the movement toward shunning
Snyder on Election Day. The anti-Snyder movement within the GOP ranks gained
steam after last weekend’s state party convention where the tea party candidate
for lieutenant governor lost by a wide margin to the incumbent, Snyder running
mate Brian Calley.
Terry said she is among
countless conservatives who have concluded, pre- and post-convention, that Schauer
won’t be any worse than Snyder.
Joan Fabiano of Grassroots
Michigan, a leading tea party group, is among those who were turned off by some
of the hardball politics practiced at the GOP conventions, the first step in
the nominating process for statewide candidates.
In a message to her
organization, Fabiano, who has widely proclaimed that she won’t vote for the
governor in November, called on her membership to cast aside other Republican
candidates.
She
said the establishment GOP’s efforts to marginalize the tea party were “ an
attempt to drive a stake in the heart of the limited government movement. The
status quo MIGOP is attempting to rid itself of us ‘trouble makers.’ The same
trouble makers who helped GOP candidates to historical wins in 2010. The troublemakers who were at
first embraced when it was thought we would be convenient yes men and women
propping up anyone with an "R" by his or her name despite any policy they might
push. The trouble makers whose only crime is on assistance to an adherence to
the Constitution.
“Well
it hasn't worked.
“… What it has done is create more who will NOT be the
worker bees nor vote for those "Rs" who push and promote liberal
policies.”

If Ronald Reagan took this woman to a round room in 1985 and asked her to sit in a corner and she's still be looking for it now?
ReplyDeleteAssuming she didn't starve to death in the attempt.
If Ronald Reagan took this woman to a round room in 1985 and asked her to sit in a corner she'd still be looking for it now
ReplyDeleteAssuming she didn't starve to death in the attempt.
We've held our noses and voted for the 'lesser of 2 evils' for decades now... and they think we should do it again? You know the definition of doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results!! These progressive Republicans are taking us down the same river the Democrats are, perhaps at a slightly slower pace. I'd rather have a democrat with a D behind his name for governor than to have a democrat with an R behind his name! VoteforGridlock.com
ReplyDelete